Dial v. Kirkpatrick’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 1968
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schley v. . Andrews · People ex rel. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co. v. Burke · Barnard v. Bilby · Pasley v. Union Nat. Bank of Bartlesville · Bass v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court considered this question in the case of the City of Norman v. Van Camp, 87 Okl. 182 , 209 P. 925 , wherein it was held: "Where a judgment or any part thereof clearly violates the plain provisions of the Constitution or statutes, such judgment or the part thereof that is in direct conflict with the Constitution or statutes is to that extent void and cannot be enforced." Dial v. Kirkpatrick, 168 Okl. 21 , 31 P.2d 591 , 95 A.L.R. 1263 (1933).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““No contract for debt hereafter made with a member of the Osage Tribe of Indians not having a certificate of competency, shall have any validity, unless approved by the Secretary of the Interior.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.