Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 Okla. 43 - Ramsey v. Leeper

Ramsey v. Leeper’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
6
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Sublett v. City of Tulsa (1965), Harn v. State Ex Rel. Williamson (1939)

1 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

1801933194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Sapulpa v. Land · Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co. · Walton, Mayor v. Donnelly · Owen v. City of Tulsa · State v. Port of Astoria

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When land is condemned for the purpose of providing a water supply, such as in the construction of a reservoir, or for incidental use in connection therewith as in the instant case, jurors and appraisers do not make any deduction in the price paid the owner of the land on the theory that it might revert to him. Such condemnation is made in contemplation of a future continued use.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"... every city ... shall have the right and power to acquire, own and maintain ... real estate for sites and rights of way for public utility and public park purposes, and for the location thereon of waterworks....” [Emphasis ours.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.