Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 Okla. 63 - Wrightsman v. Stevenson

Wrightsman v. Stevenson’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1964
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1964

6 state decisions

301934194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Severns Paving Co. · Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of Tulsa · Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. · City of Enid v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co. · Severns Paving Co. v. Oklahoma City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statutory provision in question authorizes a reassessment of property within the district on which the original assessment has been declared void. It does not authorize a double or supplemental assessment of other property in the district. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.