Stokes v. Lundeen’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the proper construction of subsection 2(c)(A) and, particularly, the meaning of the phrase 'children are present' was a matter of law for the court to determine and to instruct the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In general, questions of law are for the court and not a proper subject for expert testimony to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“would be more of a legal interpretation rather than a factual conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.