168 Or. App. 565 - State v. Haynes’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “because the 1999 amendment had cured the source of the constitutional defect in the sentence, and, as a result, the appropriate sentence was an indeterminate life sentence with a 25-year minimum term of incarceration after which there would be a possibility of parole. The court granted defendant's motion and entered a corrected judgment under former ORS 138.083(1)(a) that omitted”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 290 Or. App. 640 - State v. Hubbard

2. “"In this case, the statute in force at the time defendant committed the crime mandated an `imprisonment for life' sentence on a conviction of murder. Under the current statute, defendant faces the possibility of parole upon completion of the minimum term. Plainly the statute is ameliorative, and its application to defendant presents no ex post facto violation."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 216 Or. App. 456 - State v. Davis

3. “provided the Board with the authority the lack of which * * * was the source of the constitutional defect in the sentence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 290 Or. App. 640 - State v. Hubbard