¶1By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 30, 1964.
¶2f We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
¶3Our consideration of the petition, the ¡record and brief of the petitioner leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied: