¶1We affirm the order on appeal, without prejudice to either party’s pursuit of modification before the trial court pursuant to section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes (2014), to address any substantial change of circumstances that may have occurred subsequent to the September 2014 hearing and January 2, 2015 order. See Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928, 932-33 (Fla.2005) (articulating substantial change test for child custody modifications); Skirko v. Skirko, 677 So.2d 885, 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (modification was warranted where substantial change of circumstances had occurred, including child’s school schedule and parents’ places of residence and work hours; and child’s best interests were served by modification).
168 So. 3d 328
Moore v. Morgan
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 8, 2015
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2015-07-08
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2018
2 state decisions
Relies on 903 So. 2d 928 - Wade v. Hirschman · 677 So. 2d 885 - Skirko v. Skirko
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2015-07-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →