Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

168 S.W. 530

Pullum v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1914-06-24

<p>Criminal Law (§ 1184*) — Appeal—Review —Disposition of Cause — Defect of Sentence.</p> <p>Where accused was properly convicted, but the sentence imposed did not comply with the indeterminate sentence law (Acts 33d Leg. c. 132), as it should have done, the clerk of the appellate court will be directed to enter the proper sentence, and the judgment, as reformed, will be affirmed.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 3199, 3200; Dec. Dig. § 1184.*]</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1914-06-24

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

¶1There, is no statement of facts. The indictment follows the statute and the approved forms, and properly charges the offense.

¶2The sentence does not comply with the indeterminate sentence law. It should have done so. The clerk of this court will enter the proper order of sentence, and this judgment, as reformed, will be affirmed.

/168/sw/530 · .json · Public domain