168 Tex. Crim. 595 - Fleming v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2004
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 165 Tex. Crim. 371 - Cedillo v. State · 162 Tex. Crim. 314 - Outley v. State · Nesbit v. State · De Hay v. State · 134 Tex. Crim. 222 - Ehrke v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While the state had the right to charge in separate counts of the information the two ways named in the statute Art. 741, supra, by which it was alleged that appellant did unlawfully practice medicine, only one offense was actually charged against the appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State“the prosecuting attorney may carve as large an offense out of a single transaction as he can, but he must cut only once....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alejos v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.