Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 U.S. 208 - Crespin v. United States

Crespin v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

168 U.S. 208 · 1897

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 1969
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1969 · most notably Hayes v. United States (1898), United States v. Pena (1899)

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

11018971900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The United States v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo · United States v. Juan Percheman · Hart v. Burnett · Strother v. Lucas · John Charles Fremont v. The United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ If there be any hardship to the petitioners in the rejection of this grant, they must apply for relief to another department of the Government. ¥e are bound by the language of the act creating the Court of Private Land Claims.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.