Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 U.S. 311 - Harrison v. Perea

Harrison v. Perea’s Empirical Analysis

168 U.S. 311 · 1897

Citation profile

198
cited by 198 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 36 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 198 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2020 · most notably Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society (1975), William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Hutchins (1907)

57 federal appellate · 36 district · 35 state decisions — followed in 16 states

43018971900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trustees v. Greenough · Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. Garland · Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co. · Shields v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 198 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By nmltifariousness in a bill is meant the improperly joining in one bill distinct and independent matters, and thereby confounding them, as, for example, the uniting, in one bill of several matters, perfectly distinct and unconnected, against one defendant, or the demand of several matters of a distinct and independent nature against several defendants in the same bill.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The amount was within the judicial discretion of the court, and in fixing that amount the trial court could proceed upon its own knowledge of the value of the solicitor’s services. Trustees v. Greenough, 105 U. S. 527 [ 26 L. Ed. 1157 ]; Fowler v. Equitable Trust Co., 141 U. S. 411 -415 [ 12 Sup. Ct. 7 , 35 L. Ed. 793 ].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““We think no error arises from the action of the court below. By the exertions of the solicitor the fund was recovered, and it was properly made to bear some portion of the expense of its administration.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.