Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 U.S. 611 - Craighill v. Lambert

Craighill v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis

168 U.S. 611 · 1898

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1992 · most notably Newburyport Water Company v. City of Newburyport (1904), Reichelderfer v. Quinn (1932)

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 24 state decisions

11018981900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Bauman v. Ross · Shoemaker v. United States · Dows v. City of Chicago · Ogden City v. Armstrong · Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. Armstrong

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There can be no reason or propriety in appealing to a court of equity to restrain proceedings that are being conducted in other courts, competent to construe the statutes under which they act, and to decide every question that may arise in the course of the proceeding. To allow litigations to be thus diverted tends to the multiplication of litigation, and the production of unnecessary delay and expense — to say nothing of the unnecessary vexation to parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.