Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 VA 397 - Trice v. Powell

Trice v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2018

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

50193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brant v. Virginia Coal and Iron Company et al. · Conrad v. Conrad's · Davis v. Kendall · Smith v. Smith's · Miller's Adm'r v. Potterfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Once we are able to ascertain the intention of the testator, we will adopt that as the polar star to guide and direct us, and in ascertaining that intention, we will look upon the instrument as a whole, and give effect, if possible, to every part thereof. If from reading the will as a whole, the testator’s intention is clear, it will stand as written; but if such intention is obscured by his modes of expression, we will first ascertain the meaning of the language used before we undertake to effectuate that intention. We will not hesitate to give to the words and phrases used the meanings they have in the usual and ordinary acceptation. If we discover the intention of the testator, even though the language be obscure and uncertain, we shall feel justified in making his will the law of the subject, unless it violates some rule of law. Conrad v. Conrad’s Ex’r, 123 Va. 711 , 97 S. E. 336, 337 ; Davis v. Kendall, 130 Va. 175 , 107 S. E. 751, 759 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““2nd: That I give and bequeath to my sister, Nannie Goodwin, all money & bonds and the entire landed estate to do as she thinks proper, so long as she remains single, but if she marries it is to be sold and divided between the heirs of body of Julia D. Kuper, Mattie W. Powell & Robert Goodwin, and she to retain one-fourth of said sale, and in the event of her death intestate, it is to be divided as above stated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.