State v. Forant’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably In re Carter (2004), State v. Couture (1999)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pelican · State v. Streich · State v. Barnett · State v. Jarvis · State v. Knapp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Damages that are not readily ascertainable, such as pain and suffering, emotional trauma, loss of earning capacity, and wrongful death awards are not proper subjects of restitution ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“only in extraordinary situations where it is obvious and strikes at the heart of defendant's constitutional rights or results in a miscarriage of justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hendricks · State v. Deyo“direct link between the crime and the restitution,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.