Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 WASH2D 1 - State v. Fry

State v. Fry’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Chambers v. Mississippi · Taylor v. Illinois · 106 Wash. 2d 54 - State v. Gunwall · State v. O'NEILL

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any person meeting the requirements appropriate to his or her status under this chapter shall be considered to have engaged in activities permitted by this chapter and shall not be penalized in any manner, or denied any right or privilege, for such actions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “What I'm finding here as a matter of law [is] that there's no medical marijuana defense available to Mr. Fry and, in turn, Mrs. Fry because this anxiety and other problem is not something that's on the list. And that would appear to [be] a condition, pre-condition to even asserting the affirmative defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “CP at 22. The authorization also included notes from Dr. Orvald's physical examination of Fry where he noted a scar behind Fry's right ear and on his chin from being injured by a horse. These notes also reflect that Fry suffered from neck and lower back pain. In the comments section Dr. Orvald wrote:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.