State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen · 165 Wash. 2d 1020 - State v. Orman · 110 Wash. 2d 326 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Jeffries · State v. Smith · State v. Ammons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The alternative means available to accomplish theft describe distinct acts that amount to the same crime. That is, one can accomplish theft by wrongfully exerting control over someone’s property or by deceiving someone to give up their property. In each alternative, the offender takes something that does not belong to him, but his conduct varies significantly. In contrast, the failure to register statute contemplates a single act that amounts to failure to register: the offender moves without alerting the appropriate authority. His conduct is the same—he either moves without notice or he does not. The fact that different deadlines may apply, depending on the offender’s residential status, does not change the nature of the criminal act: moving without registering.” Peterson, 168 Wash. 2d at 770 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown“prosecution must prove to sustain a conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.