Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 Wis. 2d 135 - State v. Piskula

168 Wis. 2d 135 - State v. Piskula’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 160 Wis. 2d 1 - Gonzalez v. Teskey · 152 Wis. 2d 243 - State v. Wilke · 158 Wis. 2d 690 - In RE MARRAIGE OF ONDRASEK v. Tenneson · 138 Wis. 2d 192 - Midwest Mutual Insurance v. Nicolazzi · 158 Wis. 2d 500 - City of Mequon v. Hess

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 343.305(4), Stats., sets forth the information that Piskula must be informed about with respect to taking a BAC test. Piskula's driving privileges would have been immediately suspended if any test resulted in a BAC of 0.10% or more. See sec. 343.305(7), Stats. Pursuant to sec. 343.305(4)(c)l, Piskula was informed that if any test resulted in a BAC of 0.10% or more, in addition to other penalties that may be imposed, his driving privileges would be suspended. Piskula was properly informed of the law. Thus, we conclude that Piskula's due process rights were not violated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Drexler
  2. “Piskula was actually informed of all rights and penalties relating to him. He was not informed about the rights and penalties relating to drivers of commercial vehicles, but Piskula was not driving a commercial vehicle and he does not assert that he was driving or on duty time with respect to a commercial vehicle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 176 Wis. 2d 487 - State v. Geraldson
  3. “he should have been advised that if his primary test resulted in a BAC of 0.10% or more and he requested an additional test that resulted in a BAC of less than 0.10%, his driving privileges would not be immediately suspended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Drexler

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.