Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 W. Va. 385 - State v. Ward

168 W. Va. 385 - State v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 157 W. Va. 640 - State v. Thomas · 165 W. Va. 547 - State v. Grimm · 140 W. Va. 444 - State v. Pietranton · 161 W. Va. 67 - Wilhelm v. Whyte · 137 W. Va. 585 - State v. Fitzsimmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a trial court grants a pre-trial discovery motion requiring the prosecution to disclose evidence in its possession, non-disclosure by the prosecution is fatal to its case where such non-disclosure is prejudicial. The non-disclosure is prejudicial where the defense is surprised on a material issue and where the failure to make the disclosure hampers the preparation and presentation of the defendant’s case.” Syllabus Point 2, State v. Grimm, 165 W.Va. 547 , 270 S.E.2d 173 (1980).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The exceptions permitting evidence of collateral crimes and charges to be admissible against an accused are recognized as follows: the evidence is admissible if it tends to establish (1) motive; (2) intent; (3) the absence of mistake or accident; (4) a common scheme or plan embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish the others; and (5) the identity of the person charged with the commission of the crime on trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The determination of what is good cause, pursuant to W.Va.Code, 62-3-1, for a continuance of a trial beyond the term of indictment is in the sound discretion of the trial court, and when good cause is determined a trial court may, pursuant to W.Va.Code, 62-3-1, grant a continuance of a trial beyond the term of indictment at the request of either the prosecutor or defense, or upon the court’s own motion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.