168 W. Va. 511 - Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 162 W. Va. 925 - Kanawha Valley Bank v. Friend · 157 W. Va. 866 - Dorsey v. Short · 138 W. Va. 759 - Lett v. Twentieth Street Bank · 157 W. Va. 683 - State Ex Rel. Walker v. Jenkins · 158 W. Va. 554 - Wilkes v. Summerfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A presumption of constructive fraud may arise in connection with joint bank accounts with survivorship, if the parties to the joint account occupy a fiduciary or confidential relationship. This presumption requires the person who benefits from the creation of the account to bear the burden of proving that the funds were, in fact, a bona fide gift.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“At the crux of our holding in Kanawha Valley Bank v. Friend, supra, was the fact that the surviving joint tenant, by virtue of having a power of attorney from the other joint tenant, a Mr. Dunbar, had a fiduciary relationship independent of the joint account. By using the power of attorney he had cashed treasury bills belonging to Mr. Dunbar and had the proceeds deposited in the joint bank account.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vance v. Vance
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.