Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 W. Va. 561 - State v. Greenlief

168 W. Va. 561 - State v. Greenlief’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2019

13 state decisions

901981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Anderson v. United States · Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wisconsin · 163 W. Va. 502 - State v. Atkins · 158 W. Va. 905 - State v. Starr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where it becomes relevant to show that a certain statement or declaration was made, regardless of the truth or falsity of the statement or declaration itself, such proof is not hearsay and should be admitted. It is evidence of what, in some of the books, is termed a "verbal fact."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[the jurors] were not told that they had a choice, or that they might infer that conclusion; they were told only that the law presumed it. It is clear that a reasonable juror could easily have viewed such an instruction as mandatory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “which was not mandatory or binding at all. Further, and perhaps the most compelling, support for this resolution is found in the dictionary definition of these terms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.