Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 W. Va. 707 - State v. Harless

168 W. Va. 707 - State v. Harless’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably 170 W. Va. 662 - State v. Neider (1982), 180 W. Va. 342 - State v. England (1988)

2 federal appellate · 72 state decisions

5001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wisconsin · Central Railroad v. Pennsylvania

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At common law, the definition of robbery was (1) the unlawful taking and carrying away, (2) of money or goods, (3) from the person of another or in his presence, (4) by force or putting him in fear, (5) with intent to steal the money or goods.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any person who commits or attempts to commit robbery by: (1) Committing violence to the person, including, but not limited to, partial strangulation or suffocation or by striking or beating; or (2) uses the threat of deadly force by the presenting of a firearm or other deadly weapon, is guilty of robbery in the first degree and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state correctional facility not less than ten years.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Most courts have concluded that a photographic array will not be deemed excessively suggestive as long as it contains some photographs that are fairly representative of the defendant’s physical features. The fact that some of the photographs are dissimilar to the defendant’s appearance will not taint the entire array.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.