Uslan v. Bowen

Decided January 5, 1934

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2004

1 district · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-01-05

¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

¶2For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

¶3For reversal — None. *99