State v. Jeffrey Reed’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990)
Relies on Brogan v. United States · Bilski v. Kappos · Bilski v. Kappos · Doe v. Pataki · State v. Cole
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Court may look elsewhere to determine the legislative intent in order to provide a fair and reasonable construction of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]estimony given to a committee of the Legislature may provide some clues as to the purpose of [an] amended statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We review de novo a motion for judgment of acquittal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.