169 Cal. App. 2d 307 - Hunter v. Croysdill’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2009 · most notably 14 Cal. 3d 502 - Davies v. Krasna (1975), 31 Cal. 4th 1026 - State Department of Health Services v. Superior Court (2003)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 48 Cal. 2d 805 - Grainger v. Antoyan · 23 Cal. 2d 840 - Valencia v. Shell Oil Co. · Vitagraph, Inc. v. Liberty Theatres Co. · Pacific Finance Corp. v. Foust · Milstein v. Sartain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . was designed to give public notice of the true names of individuals doing business under a fictitious name or names of all members of a partnership where the firm name does not disclose the names of all the partners, but it was not designed to protect a person who has made prior representations as to his relationship with one who subsequently files and publishes a certificate apparently at variance with those prior representations.” (See also Dodd v. Tebbetts, 198 Cal. 333, 340 [ 244 P. 1081 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Defendant takes the position that as plaintiffs did not make exhaustive inquiries into his financial status, they could not have relied thereon. There is no requirement that credit be given in reliance upon the financial status of the apparent partner, but only that the party claiming the benefit of [the California counterpart to Section 54-1-16] relied on the existence of the partnership.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.