Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 CALAPP2D 72 - Moxley v. Robertson

Moxley v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 1995
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1995

10 state decisions

4019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 3 Cal. 2d 427 - Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co. · Estate of Bristol v. Young · 114 Cal. App. 2d 148 - Hammett v. McIntyre · Guardianship of Lyle · Rodgers v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant's argument in the final analysis is that he was ill advised and that he would have been wise to have refused to join his coplaintiff in the action. The character and quality of the advice he received is not an issue before this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.