People v. McKenzie’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 81 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably People v. CALVAREST (1975), People v. Lowe (1983)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 81 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co. · Gore v. United States · Bottone v. United States · Harris v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[WJhere the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Hardin · People v. Lowe“Under the Drug Act, the State must prove that the accused had actual or constructive possession of a narcotic drug. And under the Use Act, it is sufficient to prove that the accused used or was under the influence of a narcotic.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Campbell v. People“if any state of facts can reasonably be conceived that will justify the classification, the existence of these facts will be assumed by the courts in order to uphold the legislation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Goodale
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.