Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

169 F. 1022

Docket No. 247.

In re Roberts

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1909.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1909-04-13

<p>Petition to Review Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1932

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on In re Kalb & Berger Mfg. Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1909-04-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Petition to Review Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2L. & A. U. Zinke (L. Zinke, of counsel), for petitioner.

¶3Before LACOMBE, WARD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The state suit is brought against the Receiver and his. clerk personally. The question raised here has already been decided by this court in Re Kalb & Berger Manfg. Co., 165 Fed. 895. The order of the bankrupt court, restraining the prosecution of suit in the state court, is reversed.

/169/f1d/1022 · .json · Public domain