Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 F.1d 912 - The Hurstdale

The Hurstdale’s Empirical Analysis

169 F. 912 · 1909

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 1931
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1931

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

101909191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Owners represent that the steamer under ordinary conditions, and laden, will steam on an average about 8% knots per hour on about 17 tons of best Welsh coal for 24 hours', and that her dead weight capacity for cargo and bunkers is about 5,200 to 5,250 tons. These particulars are not guaranteed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.