Clark v. Propper’s Empirical Analysis
169 F.2d 324 · 1948
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1995
7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 95A
Relies on Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Meredith v. City of Winter Haven · Markham v. Allen · Chicago v. Fieldcrest Dairies, Inc. · Musser v. Utah
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The language of Exec. Order 8389 prohibits the unlicensed transfer of an enemy alien's property. There is no cogent reason for excepting transfers by judicial process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any receiver appointed . . . shall have all the powers and duties ... possessed by and conferred upon receivers and trustees by the laws of the state of New York,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Propper v. Clark“that a temporary receiver under this provision takes the usual powers of other temporary receivers in New York.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Propper v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.