Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 F.2d 973 - Hunter v. Wade

Hunter v. Wade’s Empirical Analysis

169 F.2d 973 · 1948

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
May 1995
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1995 · most notably Wade v. Hunter (1949), Himmelfarb v. United States (1949)

27 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

180194819501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1471 · 10 U.S.C. § 1522 · 10 U.S.C. § 1564

Relies on United States v. Josef Perez · Logan v. United States · Ex Parte Nielsen · Simmons v. United States · Jefferson & Clearfield Coal & Iron Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the general rule that an accused is in jeopardy within the meaning of the guaranty against double jeopardy contained in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States when he is put on trial in a court of competent jurisdiction upon an indictment or information sufficient in form and substance to sustain a conviction, and a jury has been empaneled and sworn; and where the case is tried to the court without the intervention of a jury, jeopardy attaches when the court begins the hearing of evidence.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ * * * where a case is tried to a court without a jury, jeopardy begins after accused has been indicted and arraigned, has pleaded and the court has begun to hear evidence.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Law Member: The Court desires that further witnesses be called into the case, and to allow time to secure these witnesses, this case will be continued. We would like to have as witnesses brought before the Court, the parents of this person making the accusation, Rosa Glowsky, and also the sister-in-law that was in the room who could further assist in the identification or identity of the accused. The Court will be continued until a later date set by the T.[rial] J.fudge] A.[dvocate].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.