Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 F.2d 983 - Bernhardt v. United States

Bernhardt v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

169 F.2d 983 · 1948

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1992

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

50194819501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)

Relies on Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan · United States v. Birdsall · John Murphy v. Angus Stewart Administrator of Alexander Grant · Anderson v. United States · Shiflett v. Welch

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.