List v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
169 F.3d 1148 · 1999
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2017
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barron v. Sullivan · Jones v. Chater · McClain v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Retrospective medical diagnoses constitute relevant evidence concerning the degree of disability prior to the expiration of the insured period. See Jones v. Chater, 65 F.3d 102, 104 (8th Cir.1995). ‘Where the impairment onset date is critical, however, retrospective medical opinions alone will usually not suffice unless the claimed onset date is corroborated, as by subjective evidence from lay observers like family members.” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.