United States v. Chacko’s Empirical Analysis
169 F.3d 140 · 1999
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Ruff (2015), Portuondo Superintendent Fishkill Correctional Facility v. Agard (2000)
45 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin · Hudson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not determinative whether the same conduct underlies the counts; rather it is critical whether the 'offense' -- in the legal sense, as defined by Congress -- complained of in one count is the same as that charged in another.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“An indictment is multiplicitous when it charges a single offense as an offense multiple times, in separate counts, when, in law and fact, only one crime has been committed.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice— (1) to defraud a financial institution; or (2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises; shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.