Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 F.3d 190 - Warren v. Fairfax County

Warren v. Fairfax County’s Empirical Analysis

169 F.3d 190 · 1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2017

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

40199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · City of Boerne v. Flores

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Schneider v. State of New Jersey, 308 U.S. 147 , 160 (1939). As the definitions quoted above indicate, and any stroll will confirm, parks and malls are often designed merely for aesthetic purposes, including plantings. The test is not whether the property was designed for expressive activity, but whether the objective uses and purposes of the property are compatible with the wide measure of expressive conduct characterizing public fora. See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 116 (1972) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “, places restrictions on the government's ability to designate the class for whose especial benefit the forum has been opened. The Supreme Court has not yet clearly stated what these external limitations are, except to say that once a limited forum has been created, entities of a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “are justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech, that they are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and that they leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.