Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

169 F.3d 215

Docket No. 97-40365.

Bartley v. Euclid Inc.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 26, 1999.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1999-02-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2001

1 federal appellate ·

5 counsel of record

Relies on Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · Bartley v. Euclid, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-02-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Andy Wade Tindel, Tyler, TX, James Mark Mann, Wellborn, Houston, Adkison, Mann, Sadler & Hill, Henderson, TX, Don Wheeler, Wheeler & Russell, Center, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellees Cross-Appellants.

¶2Kevin J. Croy, James Preston Dobbs, III, Burford & Ryburn, Dallas, TX, for Interve-nor Plaintiff-Appellee.

¶3H. Douglas Wabner, Ben Taylor, Fulbright & Jaworski, Tim Marlin Wheat, Dallas, TX, William Joseph Boyce, Fulbright & Jaworski, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Intervenor Defendant Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

¶4Clifton T. Hutchinson, Bert Black, Hughes & Luce, Dallas, TX, Hugh F. Young, Jr., Product Liability Advisory Council, Reston, VA, for Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc.

¶5David P. Herrick, Dallas, TX, for Washington Legal Foundation.

¶7ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶8Before POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DÚHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

¶9BY THE COURT:

¶10A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶11IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/169/f3d/215 · .json · Public domain