169 F.3d 666
Docket Nos. 96-36017, 96-36266, 96-36267.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
March 9, 1999.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1999-03-09
Relies on Lambert v. Ackerly
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-03-09
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Valerio v. Putnam Associates Inc. (1999), Denius v. Dunlap (2003)
12 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Before: HUG, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Lambert v. Ackerly, 156 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir.1998), is withdrawn.
Judge McKeown was recused