Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 F.3d 755 - Davis County Solid Waste Management & Energy Recovery Special Service District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Davis County Solid Waste Management & Energy Recovery Special Service District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Empirical Analysis

169 F.3d 755 · 1999

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 12 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of Elections (2007), Role Models America, Inc. v. Brownlee (2004)

12 federal appellate · 12 district ·

230199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air · City of Riverside v. Rivera · Blanchard v. Bergeron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Davis County Solid Waste Management and Energy Recovery Special Service Dist., 169 F.3d 755 , 760 n. 8 (D.C.Cir.1999) (citations omitted). See also, Copeland, 641 F.2d 880, 891-92 (D.C.Cir.1980) ( en banc ). (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[g]iven [petitioner's] success in the case, [] the time its attorneys spent on alternative grounds should not be used to reduce its award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.