US Brass Corp v. US’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2013
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Frito-Lay, Inc. v. LTV Steel Co. · Manges v. Seattle-First National Bank · Berryman Products Inc Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) who, like the Cox Plaintiffs, are designated as Class 5 claimants in the U.S. Brass reorganization plan. Id. at 958. The relief they sought would have required the Brass Trust to reallocate its future disbursements of insurance recoveries pro rata among all Class 5 claimants, instead of the 80%/20% split provided for in the Cox Plaintiffs' Settlement Agreement. Id. at 961. In order to effectuate this relief, the ISC proposed removing the Cox Plaintiffs' Settlement Agreement from the plan. Id. We held, however, that it”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the transactions that have taken place to date, the exchange of mutual releases, the disbursements already made, and the general implementation of the plan by all the involved parties evidence substantial consummation of the plan.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The proponent of a plan or the reorganized debtor may modify such plan at any time after confirmation of such plan and before substantial confirmation of such plan ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.