169 F. Supp. 707 - Rosof v. Roth’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 108 · 11 U.S.C. § 110 · 11 U.S.C. § 701
Relies on Studley v. Boylston National Bank · New York County National Bank v. Massey · Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co. · National Bank of Newport v. National Herkimer County Bank of Little Falls · Citizens' Nat. Bank v. Lineberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred with actual intent, as distinguished from intent presumed in law, to hinder, delay, or defraud either present or future creditors, is fraudulent as to both present and future creditors.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.