Kingston v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (§ 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Allen v. Wright · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer · United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“acknowledge[d] that his request to expatriate was not received by [the Department of] Homeland Security[, which was] the agency responsible for such decisions,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Farrell v. Tillerson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.