Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 ILL 152 - Keller v. Bading

Keller v. Bading’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
November 1943
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1943

5 state decisions

20189719001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedKeller v. Bading

Relationships

Relies on Colehour v. State Savings Institution

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The claim asserted by appellants to this fund rendered the filing of this bill necessary on the part of appellees. Appellants did not disclaim but by their demurrer denied the right to relief. They were actively contesting the right of appellees to have a decree, and the costs were properly awarded against them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.