Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 Ill. App. 3d 1 - People v. Davis

169 Ill. App. 3d 1 - People v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2025

4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

5019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Edwards v. Arizona · Illinois v. Allen · 101 Ill. 2d 147 - People v. Silagy · 92 Ill. 2d 85 - People v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘[A] defendant may competently waive counsel if such an election is voluntary and constitutes “a knowing and intelligent relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.” ’ People v. Baker (1982), 92 Ill. 2d 85, 91 , quoting Edwards v. Arizona (1981), 451 U. S. 477, 482 , 68 L. Ed. 2d 378, 385 , 101 S. Ct. 1880, 1883 . * * * In ruling on a motion for self-representation, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has the requisite capacity to make an intelligent and knowing waiver of his right to counsel. The criteria generally considered in making that decision include the defendant’s age, level of education, mental capacity and prior involvement, if any, in legal proceedings.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.