Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 IND 488 - Eacock v. State

Eacock v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
8
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

114 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently August 1989 · most notably Montgomery v. Crum (1928), Williams v. State (1919)

114 state decisions

310190719101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spies v. People · Deal v. State · Shields v. State · Branch v. Faust · Musser v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is sufficient if the minds of the parties meet understandingly so as to bring about an intelligent and deliberate agreement to do the acts and commit the offense charged, although such agreement be not manifest by any formal words. Concurrence of sentiment and cooperative conduct in an unlawful and criminal enterprise, and not formality of speech, are the essential ingredients of criminal conspiracy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““It is claimed by appellant that the Court erred in permitting the State to introduce evidence, concerning alleged conspiracies by appellant to blackmail, other than that set forth in the indictment. Such evidence was properly admitted as tending to show the guilty knowledge, intent and motive of appellant in doing what is charged in the indictment.” 169 Ind. at 491 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.