Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 IND 537 - Ferguson v. Boyd

Ferguson v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
5
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably Sinclair v. Gunzenhauser (1912), 114 N.J. Eq. 571 - Rutherford Nat. Bank v. H.R. Bogle Co. (1933)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

90190719101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goodwin v. State · Hoyt v. Latham · Ryason v. Dunten · Hudelson v. Hudelson · Jackson v. Stanfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Being compelled to ask the interposition of a court of equity in his behalf, he must first have the standard of equity applied to his own conduct. If that condemn him he must go out of court. ‘He who comes into a court of equity must come with clean hands’ is a maxim rigidly enforced and sternly applied to the conduct of every person who seeks the aid of a court of conscience. ‘One who comes for relief into a court whose proceedings are intended to reach the conscience of the parties,’ says Mr. Justice Wells, in Hassam v. Barrett (1873), 115 Mass. 256 , ‘must have that standard applied to his own conduct in the transaction out of which his grievance arises. If that condemns himself he cannot insist upon applying it to the other party.’ This rule is as applicable to a plaintiff in a suit to declare an absolute deed a mortgage and to be allowed to redeem, as in any other case, and he is under the same obligation to do equity as any other person who seeks redress in a court of equity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.