169 Ind. App. 621 - Duty v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2004 · most notably Taylor v. State (1982), Tacy v. State (1983)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Summers v. State · 127 Ind. App. 292 - Shupe v. BELL · 167 Ind. App. 22 - Seay v. State · 160 Ind. App. 188 - Ingram v. State · Hicks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘First, the Juvenile Court must be presented with a petition requesting that the child be declared a delinquent. IC 1971,31-5-7-7 (Burns Code Ed.). This petition may be submitted by any person requesting the court to act. Secondly, the court must conduct a preliminary investigation into the home and environmental sitúa tion of the child, his previous history and the circumstances of the condition alleged. Thirdly, the court must determine whether it will take jurisdiction. Finally, if jurisdiction is obtained, then the court must authorize the probation officer to file a formal petition of delinquency. IC 1971,31-5-7-8 (Burns Code Ed.). Unless jurisdiction is obtained in this manner, no jurisdiction is established.’ ” Duty v. State (1976), [169] Ind. App. [621], 349 N.E.2d 729 , quoting Summers v. State (1967), 248 Ind. 551 , 230 N.E.2d 320 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““In passing on a challenge to juvenile jurisdiction this court considers the following to be essential documents: (1) the petition praying Seay be found delinquent, (2) the record of the pre-petition investigation, (3) the order of the Juvenile Court directing the probation officer to file a delinquency petition, (4) the delinquency petition, (5) the request or petition for waiver, (6) the record of the waiver hearing, (7) the finding of the Juvenile Court regarding waiver, and (8) the waiver order.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Murphy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.