Faidley v. Emrich’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““. . . The rule is stated in Converse v. Watts, 127 Kan. 673 , 275 Pac. 181 , as follows: “ ‘All through these opinions applying and approving constructive notice the modification is observed to the effect that if the evidence shows that the conduct of the defendant was such as to throw plaintiffs off their guard, or to lull them into a sense of security so as to lead them to omit or forego the examination of the records, then the statute begins to run from the date of the actual knowledge of the fraud’.” (p. 237.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Stratton v. Wood Construction Co.