Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

169 Minn. 272

211 N.W 5

State v. Johanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1926

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1926-12-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1954

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-12-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*273 Pee Curiam.

¶1 Convicted in justice court of maintaining a nuisance in tbe nature of a dispensary of intoxicating liquor, defendant attempted to appeal to the district court. He neglected to have his appeal bond approved by the justice. The statute requires in connection with such an appeal “a recognizance, with sufficient surety, to be approved by the justice.” G. S. 1923, subd. 1, § 9129. Such a recognizance, so approved, is jurisdictional. This is an appeal from the order of the district court dismissing the attempted appeal from the justice court. For the reason indicated, that order was right and therefore is affirmed.

/169/minn/272 · .json · Public domain