Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 MO 12 - Thompson v. Traders' Insurance

Thompson v. Traders' Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
12
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably People's Fire Insurance v. Goyne (1906), Keller v. Home Life Insurance (1906)

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions — followed in 12 states

200190219101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gulf Ry Co v. Ellis · Atchison Co v. Matthews · Scudder v. Union National Bank · Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad · St Louis Ry Co v. Paul

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Scudder v. Bank, 91 U. S. 406 , the Supreme Court of the United States formulated a rule bearing upon the doctrine of the lex loci contractus, lex loci rei sitae, and lex fori, as follows: ‘Matters bearing upon the execution, the interpretation, and the validity of a contract are determined by the law of the place where the contract is made. Matters connected with its performance are regulated by the law prevailing at the place of performance. Matters respecting the remedy, - such as the bringing of suits, admissibility of evidence, statutes of limitation, depend upon the law of the place where the suit is brought.’ The Missouri statute imposing this penalty for vexatious delay, does not relate to the remedy. It is a matter connected with the performance of a contract. Hence, it can only apply to contracts that are to be performed in Missouri. It has no application to contracts like the policy in suit, which was made in Kansas, where the property insured was located and was destroyed in Kansas, where the contract was to be performed in Kansas, and where the cause of action accrued and became complete in Kansas.” [See Thompson v. Traders’ Ins. Co., 169 Mo. 12, 29 , 68 S. W. 889 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.