Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 N.C. App. 137 - State v. Winslow

169 N.C. App. 137 - State v. Winslow’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Price · 128 N.C. App. 688 - State v. Wilson · State v. McBane · State v. Crabtree · 155 N.C. App. 120 - State v. Holliman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The dissent then applied this reasoning to the indictment at issue: By including the offense date in the indictment, which w;as eight days outside of the seven year time period for habitual impaired driving, the State did not properly indict defendant for habitual impaired driving. Accordingly, the indictment amendment allowed at trial was a substantial alteration of the charge and was not allowed under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-923(e).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.