Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 N.C. App. 214 - State v. Stanford

169 N.C. App. 214 - State v. Stanford’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Marion · United States v. Lovasco · State v. Hartness · State v. Malloy · Rabinovitch v. Nyquist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the defendant was at least 16 years of age, (2) he was five years older than his victim, (3) he willfully took or attempted to take an indecent liberty with the victim, (4) the victim was under 16 years of age at the time the alleged act or attempted act occurred, and (5) the action by the defendant was for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.